|
|
|
|
|
|
by cvcount
1289 days ago
|
|
|
There doesn't seem to be any good reason to believe it did: the authors of the book don't even back up the anecdote particularly strongly. https://www.theguardian.com/media/mediamonkeyblog/2015/oct/0... "The thing to point out about that story is that there is no need for burden of proof on a colourful anecdote where we’re quite upfront about our own reservations about whether to take it seriously." |
|
|