|
|
|
|
|
|
by Juliate
1296 days ago
|
|
|
I’d rather say, it’s impressive. But wonderful? It produces something impressive, yes, and can be useful for “content” producing. So it can definitely be useful (painkiller and vitamin) to artists or producers. But all in itself, what is does produce is void of process, meaning and intent. Those have still crucially to be desired, designed, modeled and injected by _someone_. Or one takes the risk of publishing something either dull either conveying unexpected meaning (thus being inauthentic in both cases). |
|
|
Here's another way to look at it. Everyone has imagination, few have the refined skills to execute. What you find with the explosion of Midjourney AI artwork is people imagining concepts, letting the compute apply the technique, and then iterate until the artifact resembles the vision. This is actually quite similar to the fim director who tells their art director what they want, then reviews, refines, and iterates until the vision is met.
Myself, last week I created an image that matched a visual idea I had over 10 years ago, which I could never execute with my limited drawing/painting skills.
So yeah, on Midjourney there's a ton of meaningless "darth vader cat" images, but there is also meaning and intent.
And we're just at the beginning. Imagine what this will be like when people can tweak an image as fluidly as you could if you were giving a human artist direction in real-time.