[haswell]

A consistent content moderation policy would accept reports of problematic content regardless of the source of the report.

To me, the bigger issue is the white glove treatment, and the appearance of preferential moderation.

But I think that’s where political realities come into play. I don’t doubt that these companies feel the need to make lawmakers feel heard or risk legislation/regulation that will harm the platforms.

I think this is touching on something much bigger, in that these kinds of government/company relationships are everywhere, and have been for decades.

The difference with the Twitter situation is one of public visibility and direct impact on individuals trying to do something as seemingly innocuous as post and share links on social media.

Which is absolutely not to excuse the behavior. If anything, I hope this wakes up more average Americans to the kinds of quid pro quo and shady handshake deals that have been going on forever.