|
|
|
|
|
|
by hunterb123
1289 days ago
|
|
|
You misunderstand. I'm saying if they didn't look at only the rural cells then there's not much point in using that to determine whether to award funding for providing rural broadband... Just because there's a lot of people in highly populated cells that drag down the speed for people in those cells has nothing to do with the speeds of the lowly populated cells. tldr; it makes no sense to average all cells together, as the goal is to improve the areas where existing infrastructure have failed in specific regions. (and in those areas, where hughesnet, or viasat, or old DSL were the few options, Starlink does it's best) |
|
|