|
|
|
|
|
by mustache_kimono
1303 days ago
|
|
> No shit they are better for users, that's their entire fucking point! I'm not even sure we disagree about anything, and you're yelling? FWIW I package and distribute my software but for a long time I didn't. My position is very simple -- it's always easier if someone else does the work for you. If someone chooses not to distribute with a package, that's fine. If it bothers you, the choice is to build a package spec and pipeline for that project, not to moan about it. But packages are not an entitlement of a non-paying user. That user is perfectly entitled not to use your software, because complaining about the packages you may or may not have available is stupid, and not the devs problem. |
|