|
|
|
|
|
|
by mikkergp
1288 days ago
|
|
|
> Symbols associated with credible calls to violence. This seems very squishy to me, I mean, fine, I don’t disagree, but it’s exactly the kind of thing old Twitter would be dragged for. Which symbols are “credible calls to violence” and who gets to decide that? Musk? I mean yes from a legal perspective he owns it, but his whole Schtick was greater transparency. If he wants to run Twitter “same as the old guard but his opinion, not theirs” ok, but then I want to stop hearing the moral grandstanding. |
|
|
Right?! His property, his rules - it's totally fine whatever he decides. He just doesn't get wrap himself in the free speech flag.