[medo-bear]

i am a big advocate for common lisp use but i still don't see your point. are you saying that the whole point of having a clojure on rust is to have native compilation? because i imagine "clojure on rust" for the parent means having a clojure-like-syntax on rust, keeping in mind that rust is a statically typed language (kind of a big point of rust)

[pjmlp]

Common Lisp supports gradual typing.

[medo-bear]

but not static mem allocation

[pjmlp]

It surely does, including stack values.

That is the thing, Lisp is not only lists unless one is stuck using Lisp 1.5.

[medo-bear]

i dont think were talking about the same thing unless youre claiming that common lisp can be non garbage collected. otherwise stack allocation is very implementation dependent