|
|
|
|
|
by zmgsabst
1302 days ago
|
|
Is it that hard to talk about? A tangle in the interior of a cylinder loses information when viewed on the boundary because you lose a dimension (ie, the shadow cast by string around a light bulb as you see it on the lamp shade). You then have to allocate probabilities to pseudoknot resolutions (ie, guesses about crossings). So you end up with something that looks like continuous geometry on the inside and quantized statistics about interactions on the boundary. Entanglement looks like taking two filaments in a plasma globe and moving one in a circle around the other. Their ribbons are now tangled. (As a 2+1-D analog.) |
|
Another way of saying it is that the two descriptions are different representations of the same object. There is no projection or information lost in switching between descriptions.