[andyjohnson0]

I'm not disputing that the Quanta article is factually deficient - although I don't have the relevant specialist knowledge to understand why. I am disputing that this marks the "death" of the magazine.

[dekken_]

Purely speaking for myself, but I could tell it was metaphorical. Given the "magazine" is still operating, and that I read some of the article.

[nobodyandproud]

A plain reading of the first four or five paragraphs doesn’t tell me that this is a calculation.

[dekken_]

I meant that the magazine is not literally dead, but in the sense of "dead to me".

[oh_my_goodness]

Not death of magazine. Correct.

But is the distinction between calculation and experiment really specialist knowledge?