| How do you define that term? I don't want to see any more young teenagers branded as sex offenders, a label they'll have to wear for the rest of their life, because they sent naked pics of themselves from their phone to a friend of theirs that's the same age. I don't want to see parents being run through the legal system because they've got some pictures of their baby that happens to be naked. I don't want to see someone being thrown in jail because they have some kind of manga which, under a broad definition, would qualify as this even though no actual children are involved. Anything that involves abuse, pornographic or otherwise, should be what the laws focus on regardless of the age of the subjects. If it was merely "child pornography" that could get your site taken down, then the first idiot teenager to post a topless shot of herself or a guy posting his junk, which you have to admit is disappointingly common, would get your site blown off the internet permanently. With SOPA in place, Chatroulette, or anything like it, would never have happened at all. |