I mean, it is a legal time bomb in general[0], with a non-standard license that has special stipulations in an amendment. Do you really incur the weeks of lead time that it would take Legal to review the legality of redistributing this model?
Not really. You're not responsible for how users use products you distribute. The license is passed along to them, they would be the ones violating it.
No, I'm not. If you have supporting precedent for your position (that a licensor can be held liable for the unpreventable actions of a licensee) I would like to see it.