[rozularen]

I've been working with Neo4j daily for the past 3+ years and at first I was surprised by the comparison until I discovered memgraph works in-memory in contrast of Neo4j which works on disk. As others commenters have already said, I'd make it clear in your page to make it fair.

[mbuda]

Fair point, but it's not only that, there are many differences, it's mostly impossible to put 2 different systems in a fair config state, it's more about how different systems operate with certain configs / in certain environments. E.g. apparently Neo4j limits the number of concurrent execution threads in the community edition, which means it's not possible to fully stress the system... stuff like that :)

[mapleeman]

Thanks for the input. It is a fair point. It is hard to create benchmark that is universally fair. But both things serve the same/similar purpose, on top of that, Neo4j also loads a bunch of stuff into RAM, consuming more memory than Memgraph, if your dataset fits in RAM, it because quite a fair comparison.