| > Do you think assumptions and definitions are something different? Nah, I'm sure we can go real deep into how they relate to each other. Here I was just stressing their importance together, not their distinctiveness. > I think 4 comes closes > I guess, I was assuming none of these Well, you are underestimating the genius of that choice. Now that I thought about it, IMO, the 4 meanings could be seen as equally important but complementary perspectives into engaging with knowledge (I’m sick of the KM acronym). You are warned, I'm gonna steal it! > the less defined/fuzzy term solved well. Yeah, that is what I thought. Over (pre)defining things could lead to predefined (=limited) thinking. No always good for exploring wide topics. > Maintaining proportion Ok, so it is the proportion of 1- Breadth/depth for Knowledge 2- Gain/Losses for Business 3- flexibility/simplicity for data structure.? I just added the third one, like, how you could scale Remnote, not just as a business but also as a data-structure? what if, in the case of data-structures, scaling is seen as maintaining proportion between flexibility and simplicity? I will just say this : I have a general theory on how Outliner+DB combos have an excellent flexibility/simplicity ratio [1] (= top-notch at scaling) , So I hope the new table feature will be implemented deeply into remnote (and not as an afterthought) Good luck! [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33756956 |