I'd argue it could be termed "what-aboutism", but I personally fail to see how that matches my definition of "lashing out"...
This part in particular is what I would view as "lashing out"
I agree that it's "what-aboutism". In that regard, it does nothing to establish that TrustCor meets the standards for being a CA.
It does raise a good question for parallel discussion, though: Should Mozilla also be scrutinizing a whole bunch of other CAs as well?
This part in particular is what I would view as "lashing out"