|
|
|
|
|
by themoonisachees
1293 days ago
|
|
To be fair they do say (without proof but that can be hard to provide) that the spyware was put there by a contract developer that was not authorized to add 3rd party tools but did anyway.
That being said, given how extremely evasive they were and the lack of any tangible proof, I don't think it is unreasonable to doubt this explanation (how come you think a contract dev implementing malware isn't grounds for a lawsuit, shouldn't that be an open and shut case?) |
|