[hackish]

Because we should, and we do, get smarter with every generation. This Feelings Monster seems to focus on soft skills and SEL. Still, your comments imply you may have issues with advancing educational tools or with technology companies investing in educational features over profits.

Yes, learning arithmetic on chalkboards worked fine, but should we stop improving our methods and tools because we've already met some arbitrary bar of what you think was once good enough? No, we should improve them by any measure whenever we have the chance.

[collegeburner]

really? have our educational outcome metrics grown to reflect that? why are we lagging so much further behind other nations than we were at that time?

yes, i have issues with companies investing in anything over profits. that's generally how companies operate. while i recognize there are those who disagree i think charity belongs separately.

and anyway character development is the purview of parents not schools. public education should teach specific academic material and nothing more.

[yamtaddle]

> and anyway character development is the purview of parents not schools. public education should teach specific academic material and nothing more.

Since they have the kids about 8 hours a day, about 5 days per week, about 9 months per year, during formative ages, 13 years in a row, schools can't help but teach character development, even if they don't try to.

[jjulius]

>and anyway character development is the purview of parents not schools. public education should teach specific academic material and nothing more.

Public education needs tools. This is a tool. The article literally calls it "a teacher's aid".

[anigbrowl]

Americans love teacher's aids, and school districts drop big money on what is often gimmickry. I think this is part of why American educational outcomes at the k-12 level are often poor. Other countries don't have special teacher's editions of the textbook with answer keys, because teachers don't need them.

Universal free school meals will do far more to improve learning and social outcomes than more techno-gimmickry. I think blackboards are generally still better for most elementary school classrooms than hugely expensive digital displays because blackboards are something kids understand, there's no technology gap between seeing it and being able to use it.

When I started school a long time ago, we had little desks with a flip up lid that had a tiny blackboard in it, and bits of chalk to draw with. At a later stage teachers produced giant set-squares, protractors, and compasses designed to hold chalk instead of pencil lead. You don't need elaborate tools for a lot of foundational concepts.

Honestly, this country seems bend on turning education into fast food, with teachers being mere machine operators with more and more 'education product' experience and less and less knowledge of the subject they're supposed to be teaching. You can easily take what you learned working in a McDonalds and be productive in a KFC, but it doesn't mean you're a good cook.