|
|
|
|
|
by matai_kolila
1302 days ago
|
|
This is not the compelling argument you think it is; in this analogy I: * didn't buy my house, I inherited it, * the people I inherited it from stole it from other people who * also still live in the house somehow but just in the not-as-nice parts, and * the house is gigantic and can easily fit literally billions more people without even coming close to exhausting the resources of the house, in fact * bringing more people into the house would in fact substantially increase the house's shared ability to operate and provide for the members of the house. So yeah, if we want to use this analogy in a meaningful way, nothing at all entitles me to my house! |
|
Of course, one could be motivated to make such impassioned outpourings by a guilt regarding an ultimately comfortable existence, a fear of lacking virtue, and a thrill of proselytizing the nonbelievers, rather than a compulsion to achieve material socioeconomic outcomes for the postcolonial working class of the world. But I'm sure, dear interlocutor, you are motivated by nothing of the sort, and your intentions are of course, impregnable and wholly pure.