Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by RobotToaster 1303 days ago
I remember when I was at school about 15 years ago there were printers that used wax(?) blocks, that were just put into it, not sure how it worked exactly.
2 comments

Xerox Phaser printers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xerox_Phaser) used wax „solid ink“ blocks (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_ink)

Advantages: waterproof print; very clean; easy to change ink blocks; maintenance was mainly just emptying a tray containing small amounts of waste wax (biodegradable)

Disadvantages: when offline, the printer still used power to keep the wax in a liquid state, otherwise a cold start could take a while; colors were occasionally not as vibrant as regular laser printers

We had a tektronix with blocks - and that one had to be kept off except for very specific times, because if left on it would stay warm and over a week or two drain all the wax out of it into the waste tank.
I had to support one of these. I thought the colours were quite good but had nothing to compare with.

Main disadvantage was the smell when it was warmed up. It had to be kept in a ventilated separate room.

Yes, I forgot about the smell. Definitely a downside...

It smells like slightly burnt, melted wax. Very much like a candle, including the smoke...!

Tektronix did a range of printers that used wax. They used rolls of wax sheet. They produced fantastic output, but the rolls of wax were really expensive. And if you put a coffee mug down on a printout, they got stuck together.

I think they were meant for one-off proofs of image-heavy marketing material. The colours were intense and vibrant, in a way that no colour laser or ink-jet ever is. Also, the wax stood a bit proud of the paper, giving an embossed look. But they weren't very permanent - if you folded the printout you'd damage the image; you could even scratch the wax off with a fingernail.

These were expensive printers.