[kasey_junk]

You implied a much stronger statement to that before being called on it.

“starbucks, a vanguard/blackrock company, with msft CEO has massive debts and stabucks is paying huge interests all year long”

That implies way more than those companies are influencing the boards.

You only backed off when your basic “facts” were called out. Everyone agrees that big shareholders have influence, so besides that what are your claims?

[sylware]

"That implies way more than those companies are influencing the boards.", you mean that based on the pertinence of those debts to the company business (and the identity of their creditors), a regulatory administration could decide if it is some tax evasion scheme or something else?