|
|
|
|
|
by _8j50
1292 days ago
|
|
Yeah. On the flip side though, I am firmly against doctors and medical professionals deciding if you should be detained against your will even if you are not sane. I think the balance would be for sane people to opt out of such "treatment" so when the state/institutions attempt to imprison you, you have a way out because while certified as sane you notified them of your will. Sane or not a person is a person and not a property. Others shouldn't decide your fate without your consent unless your fate affects others. Cruelty disguised as charity is not right. But by default opt-in seems reasonable. If even euthanasia is popular, I hope my comment isn't too extreme or controversial. |
|