|
This article is extremely biased drivel. "72% voted yes (of which some were bots)". Guess what, some of the other 28% were also bots. The entire article is like this - extremely one sided, just cover any possible argument that Musk is bad, color him in the worst shades, see what sticks. Ignore the fact that many of the bans have been arbitrary and politically motivated, ignore the fact that there has been no outages despite the massive cuts, ignore the fact that there are already feature improvements, ignore the fact that he slashed costs, ignore the fact that usage is at an all time high. Instead, Musk bad, Musk unstable, tech-bros are racist, non-inclusive and transphobic, CEOs are bad and greedy, etc. But at the end of the day, the results will speak for themselves. Nobody will care what this guy thinks is the proper way to run a company - if Twitter is successful, every bloated tech company will try the same. |