[P5fRxh5kUvp2th]

> I don't think anyone ever thought I'm gay because I hang out with him, but if they did I just don't care. My mate is more important to me than some random prick's opinion.

I worked with a man I'm pretty sure was gay, does that make me a prick?

Maybe ease up on the judgement there.

[brozaman]

That's not what I meant. Obviously thinking someone is gay is not being a prick. I meant in the context where someone is being a prick about it.

[Dendilion]

Did you read his point correctly?

[P5fRxh5kUvp2th]

Did you?

Just the other day I had someone assume I was the husband of a woman I was helping out, I certainly didn't think that was enough to make judgements, nor did I feel the need to correct them.

If someone making an innocuous assumption is enough to for you to determine they're a prick, maybe you're the prick?

[Dendilion]

He clearly said that IF someone is a dick about it / a prick he just ignores them.

[P5fRxh5kUvp2th]

> I don't think anyone ever thought I'm gay because I hang out with him, but if they did I just don't care. My mate is more important to me than some random prick's opinion.

They very clearly did not say that.

[Dendilion]

I read it that the implication someone makes about him potentially being gay would only be an issue if that person implies that in a negative way and not just as an neutral observation which then would make it totally valid to say they are pricks.

[P5fRxh5kUvp2th]

right, the implication is that the assumption is dickish behavior and I emphatically disagree with that.