[mckern]

I do not disagree that when in rome, act as romans do. However, your original comment did not specify a context like the one you're stating now. If so, my point still holds, generally speaking. And again, they are not hypocrites or playing the victim; people have cultures of their own and are able to semantically distinguish what these symbols ought to mean in different context. I live in an Asian country that has been involved in the second world war, stories about the atrocities of the nazis and the imperial japanese army still survive through our grandparents and educational curriculums. We also have schools that bear the symbol of the swastika. Yet all of us are able to discern the difference in semantics when it comes to that symbol. The case here being that we can respect the culture of others by not intentionally conflating two completely different things together, the only reason for which is because you think your culture is the only one that matters, which is what I meant by "bordering on racism". Your reply, as with your original comment, willingly conflates two completely different meanings of the swastika symbol. In fact, the symbols are not even identical (one is a rotation of the other). With that, the only hypocrisy I'm observing here is your view that your culture is the only one that matters. Once again, the world does not revolve around the west.

[jquery]

The assumed context was the article, which specifically states it’s about Asians living in the West. I wasn’t assuming the West is the only culture that matters, just that the West was the specific culture under discussion. When it comes to what’s okay to fly in America, I think it’s fine to say “no swastikas or reversed swastikas”.