[imnotjames]

I'm sorry, what? Controlled by the government "behind the curtains"?

You might want to take a step back and evaluate that thought process.

Private entities are not violating freedom of speech as a legal construct and as an issue of an ideological construct - isn't it violating the private entities freedom of speech when they're being forced to host speech they don't agree with?

If you're saying that you believe a shadow governnent is controlling twitter and that's why it's considered free speech - since it's a government entity in that case, uh, I don't really think that's plausible.