|
|
|
|
|
by dmix
1293 days ago
|
|
The failure is not in the product, it’s an excellent product. Their problem is their high expectations to make it a big business. Same way Google kills good products willy-nilly because of unrealistic expectations or inability to spin it off into a self-sustainable project that builds good will with the parent brand. Whenever Alexa tries to get me to add things to my cart or search products I roll my eyes (it’s never intrusive or annoying, they know better) so I can see why it might not tie in well with their primary business or any added revenue streams. But they can make money selling the devices or on the App Store - they totally suck at promoting apps and educating users on new usecases. Especially if their AI isn’t going to improve like it hasn’t in the 5 years I’ve used it (if they are investing in the AI side heavily I haven’t seen the ROI). |
|
The fact my US-made Rainbow Echo Dot stopped working entirely when moved overseas is a testament to the Alexa service team's pernicious gatekeeper mentality. Don't even get me started on the baffling inconsistencies in behaviour exhibited by Alexa when embedded e.g. trying to control my Sonos kit.
I am especially dissatisfied having been the recipient of a pre-production first-generation Echo courtesy of a visiting BDM whilst managing an AWS team in Melbourne. Super excited at the time, super disappointed now.
Perhaps I should've paid more heed to a key early warning of a restricted and rather parochial outlook: in the first year or so of operation it was impossible to register an Echo with a service address outside of the USA, and I could only set an overseas timezone by writing my own configuration front-end. Even for a MVP, in hindsight, that was a red flag.
That quote in the article, "Alexa is a colossal failure of imagination", sums up my feeling (I am not the former employee quoted).