|
|
|
|
|
by jasode
1296 days ago
|
|
>Would not call this a failed product, The "colossal failure" in all the recent headlines means "colossal [financial Return-On-Investment] failure" because customers are not shopping with Alexa voice commands. A lot of consumers do like Alexa and millions have bought them because conveniences like turning on the lights and playing music are desirable -- but those "smart home" type of uses are not increasing revenue for Amazon. Amazon was betting on more "Alexa, buy AA batteries" (i.e. spend money) instead of just "Alexa, turn on the light". With more sales enabled by Alexa, it would have justified the billions spent on developing the voice recognition infrastructure. In that monetization sense, it's a "colossal failure". |
|
I would believe that Whole Foods could pull this off. Or maybe Target, or more generally any store that competently curates their inventory. That’s not Amazon.