Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by coutego 1296 days ago
I'd say that Racket makes for an easier introduction to Lisps, at least for people not familiar with the functional paradigm.

The reason for this is that Clojure intentionally discourages many common imperative idioms by not making any effort to support them. That forces you to learn how to do things "the Clojure way". Once you know it, you realise it makes sense and it's a better way to do thing in that context, but when you are coming from outside, it can be very hard to get things.

At least it was for me, after some 20 years of programming experience. Racket? Sure, I was able to do (simple) programs without too many problems in a matter of hours. Clojure? Lots of "huh?" moments for months until the "aha" moment when things makes complete sense.

I'm quite a big fan of Clojure, for full context.