[dmitriid]

> If you need hours to figure out if a log line is relevant or not, then you have much more important problems to take care of.

I don't.

> Has nothing to do with zealotry, just common sense.

Ah yes. "does it change the semantics of your (whole) program if that logline, that you are talking about, is not executed for some reason - or if it is executed more than once?" vs. "this logline is critical and will be e.g. parsed and used by another system and actions might be taken due to it, then I would argue it is good if you are forced to consider the potential impacts to your program. "

etc. etc.

And yet the fact is that if you need to log something your precious "mah purity" function is doing, you're stuck with "sometimes a couple of 100 lines need to be rewritten".

Where as non-cultists just do a `Log.info` etc.

If you can't understand that, well :shrug:

Edit. I just re-read that inane pseudo philosphical bullshit about "the semantics of the whole program a log line". No, I definitely don't need to consider the semantics of the whole program to add a bloody log line.