|
|
|
|
|
by smcl
1310 days ago
|
|
No idea. He claimed on HN to me years ago that he found the Arthur Whitney k interpreter code[0] to be easy to read, and said that I was revealing my own incompetence by saying I found it to be quite impenetrable. I see only one comment under his name so he's somehow got his comments bulk-deleted. He's undoubtedly a good developer, he's just also quite ... headstrong shall we say :) [0] - see http://kparc.com/b/a.c, worth noting that I was persuaded by another much more recently to give it a shot so my feelings towards this style have softened slightly. |
|
It's an abhorrently sad state of living a life in my view. But they can make money and technical feats that not many others can furthering validating their inflated ego.