[Xelynega]

> The point is that there are a lot of applications the attacker could attempt to target(through social engineering, malicious pull request, etc.)

If you want to discuss the potential damage an attacker can do with a GitHub account, why not hype it up even more unrealistically and talk about how they could have attacked any public repo on GitHub that accepts PRs. The article should either be limited to what actually happened or you should follow the thought through to its logical conclusion. Why do you stop when you've sufficiently scared people enough to start talking about datadog tooling?