[Cyberdog]

I’m dumbfounded by the idea that Musk was under any societal or business obligation to keep underperforming employees on his payroll.

As much as you may hate Musk, if you’ve been in this industry for a while, you know SV is full of people who are better at slacking, whedling, and coasting than coding, and in some cases have no skill at all and are clearly nepotism hires. Musk clearly does not have time for that sort of hiring, but I don’t think it’s a unique thing to him; any other non-SV businessowner would almost certainly be doing the same.

[anonymousab]

The idea is that Musk clearly doesn't judge performance and rather just fires haphazardly, as somewhat evidenced by the failed attempts to rehire various critical staff.

Firing them with much less severance than the "nonbelievers" he pushed out previously is a pointlessly cruel action.

Over in the EU, it is quite clearly a set of societal obligations that he is violating, ones that are enshrined in law.

[socialismisok]

I'm dumbfounded that anyone thinks these were underperforming employees.

[salad-fan]

If you think the way Space Karen has gone about these RIFs is even remotely effective at achieving that objective, I have a bridge to sell you.

[fzeroracer]

Musk has already fired what, over 80% of employees? If your rationale is that they were all underperforming then you clearly don't actually care and are just using this as a convenient wedge to push your agenda. If they weren't all underperforming, then Musk arbitrarily fired a bunch of people for nonsensical reasons.