|
|
|
|
|
by eternalban
1297 days ago
|
|
> This is a fantastic example of motivated reasoning. Did we read the same short article? [not parody] It's so short, we can copy paste it here and then you can point out where he reasoned that Google did this with intent to track. > But the blog post basically list a single symptom and jumps right to the one conclusion that fits what the author expects. OP is simply stating a consequence of this change! "Congratulations, you now have permission to geo-track me across all of your services." |
|
This and the wording across the article imply more than the factual changes. But granted, hooby's comment above is probably more correct than what I wrote.