|
|
|
|
|
by checkyoursudo
1304 days ago
|
|
There is an artist's gallery in my town. The artist sells lots of pieces (or tries to; no idea how successful). If I go and look at each piece, really take it in and absorb it fully and internalize it, but buy nothing, have I done the thing that's not exactly like stealing? If I download a PDF and read it and then delete it as soon as I am done, have I done the thing that is not exactly like stealing? If I go to a library and read that same book in its entirety without checking it out ... doesn't seem much different than reading and then deleting a PDF. Stealing someone else's book definitely seems wrong, but reading it while you are visiting their house seems fine? I am not claiming to know the right (ethical, moral, whatever) action here. I just have a super huge problem calling it "piracy" or "stealing" or whatever. Figuring out a way to support creators is hugely important, but criminalizing the mere viewing or hearing of art/music/words/etc seems extremely wrong. Anyway, I've been thinking about all this since at least Napster and I still have no idea really. |
|
For example, that person whose works are in the gallery has built their business on a balance of exposure - letting anyone who walks in look at things - and the fact that people who buy art are willing to pay a fair amount to own a physical object for display. Looking without buying is expressly part of their business model.
Book publishing is different, with the author assuming they’ll get payments from readers - much smaller than that artists but many of them. Since I don’t have any ownership rights over their work, I don’t attempt to change the terms.