|
|
|
|
|
by simple-thoughts
1300 days ago
|
|
I recently helped a small site migrate from cloudflare to IPFS with dnslink using Fleek. I understand how certain types of customers might need cloudflare’s scale and tools. But for a small, static html+js it’s completely overkill and introduces a ton of complexity. Plus the uptime and speed benefits of having the site on IPFS are great for anyone who’s using a browser extension that supports it are a big plus. |
|
Interesting. I have never hosted a site on IPFS but my assumption would be the opposite. I would expect more downtime from nodes frequently going on and offline. I would also expect longer load times because of the absence of CDNs and generally lower node uplink speeds.
I guess I'm working under the assumption that IPFS is still mostly comprised of hobby nodes hosted in basements. Sounds like IPFS has matured a bit since I last looked at it.
What role does the browser extension play in the speed gains you've seen? Is it slow without the extension? Also, would an IPFS compatible browser like Brave still require a separate extension for improved speeds?
Sorry for all the questions. I'm just super interested and eager to move back to a more censorship resistant version of the web, like the one I fell in love with as a kid.