When processing text at large scale, the usefulness of heuristic approaches like the one we're discussing diminishes rapidly.
No, in many situations, something doesn’t have to be perfect to be useful.
Again, I think you are missing the original point being made:
> Depending upon your use-case, you can get pretty good results by…
You seem to be responding as if I said:
> For all use-cases, you can get flawless results by…
Pointing out that this is not perfect is irrelevant to the point I was making. “Good enough” is usually good enough.
No, in many situations, something doesn’t have to be perfect to be useful.
Again, I think you are missing the original point being made:
> Depending upon your use-case, you can get pretty good results by…
You seem to be responding as if I said:
> For all use-cases, you can get flawless results by…
Pointing out that this is not perfect is irrelevant to the point I was making. “Good enough” is usually good enough.