[cscurmudgeon]

> I think these efforts point out something valuable, although probably not in the way the creators intended. Lots of people use "markers" of reliability, like citing your sources or making sentences with a certain kind of structure or tone, to estimate trustworthiness. These articles make it clear that it is entirely possible to have those markers, but be entirely incorrect in your assertions about the topic in question.

Also, known as syntax vs semantics.

The bet in modern NLP is that syntax is enough to arrive at semantics.