|
|
|
|
|
by gcr
1313 days ago
|
|
as someone who used to have exactly this sort of internalized shame, i think you've hit the nail on the head 100%. let's look at the statement: "biologically speaking, naked bodies arouse a sexual reaction". i'm wary of this way of thinking. here's one possible consequence: "anyone who chooses to be naked around me is trying to interact in a sexual way" when boiled down, the same root of thought leads to dark conclusions, like - "she was asking for it because she wore revealing clothing" - "i was sexually aroused and therefore couldn't control myself" |
|
I can't believe this, are you saying naked people don't sexually please other people? That's basically all I said.
Internal shame my ass. How about I use the samw logic and claim you have an internal perversion and desire to abuse others against their will, would that be fair? It works by your messed up logic but I know it is an unfair thing to say so I would never say that.
Facts are facts, let's stick to those. Maybe there are a small minority that feel no sexual desire when they see a naked adult person but since majority are not wired that way (even if they were a minority actually) you have to ask permission first. That's it, ask permission.
And people like you love to blame your upbringing or religion so you can make it about that. Stick to facts. You can pick a random atheist from scandanavia, a chinese buddhist, a muslim from pakistan and an african with a local religion (men that is) and show them a naked porn star and most if not all will be sexually aroused. This is hormones.