[richbell]

The title and article are intentionally provocative.

[nemo]

>For now, let’s be clear that I hate using them, but for the sake of brevity and ease of understanding I shall continue to use these misguided – and frankly, insidious – labels.

[richbell]

I read the article, I'm just pointing out that asking someone who is provoked by an intentionally provocative article — even if just for clicks — is silly. Not to mention that "white" or "black" has different connotations than "white boy" or "black boy".

[nemo]

If you read it then you'll be familiar with his response to that criticism, and given the responses, I'd say he's right.

[richbell]

That doesn't make it not provocative. It also misses the mark, in my opinion, by failing to mention how insanely well-connected SBF is.