Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by PuppyTailWags 1311 days ago
But the cost of Twitter Blue was to actively drive away your major revenue stream, the advertisers. When you're saddled with a ton of debt actively driving away your revenue doesn't seem like MBA-101 to me.
1 comments

Unless those advertisers won't be coming along into the new, changed twitter anyhow.
That still doesn't look good to your future revenue stream, because you've costed at least one client over a billion dollars. Why would your future revenue stream pay you?
The client didn't lose a billion dollars. Their investors did.