Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by drew-y 1312 days ago
While I respect your opinion, I'd like to offer another perspective.

Renaming a (recent) symbol of human progress is not the same thing as erasing history. That would be removing James Webb's name from the wall of NASA's former leaders, removing him from history books, etc. No one is proposing that.

Instead, it is holding our symbols to a high standard. We should pick those who truly stood out and above. There are plenty of historical figures that made great contributions to humanity at NASA. I doubt they would struggle to find an alternative.

That being said, based on the conclusions of the report, I think the name should stay.

2 comments

Most great people are not good persons
Expecting every historical great person to have zero skeletons in the closet based on todays political perspectives is unrealistic and irrational anyway.

Of course there are degrees of malice but social media loves this sort of zero-effort cultural gatekeeping where they get to pearl clutch and feel like they are improving the world from the keyboard.

Renaming JWT (even before it was found to be mostly baseless) is just another slacktivist exercise with little real value to society.

Props for being able to articulate coherent and reasonable principles, independently of your own final determination.