[mirzap]

There's no such thing as "no architecture". If you have code, you have architecture even if it's not formally defined. If you don't have software architect on the team whose whole job is to lay out architecture for the team - then you're more likely than not to have "bad architecture".

[kirillrogovoy]

> There's no such thing as "no architecture".

I kind of agree with it as an absolute statement, but I tend to use the word "architecture" rather relatively.

There's always _some_ structure to anything, yes. The question is how much is too much (or too little).