|
|
|
|
|
by notch656a
1308 days ago
|
|
Clearly the advantages and disadvantages have both overlapping and mutually exclusive elements. For this reason It makes sense to me that some may choose to diversify their holdings by taking advantage of both. To me relying fully on the bank doesn't seem safe at all, as the IRS and other agencies have been known to arbitrarily seize accounts based on absurd claims of 'structuring' even for sub 10k deposits [0]. Crypto is volatile, and you can forget your seed string, but nearly impossible to seize if appropriate precautions taken. Local value like land/durable goods retain value largely as long as you can defend them by force, but are poor choices when fleeing. As time moves on it's clear to me all these assets are becoming important members of the financial landscape. If crypto were merely a degraded version of the dollar, then I don't think so many people would use. [0] https://ij.org/report/seize-first-question-later/ |
|