|
|
|
|
|
|
by Bubble_Pop_22
1321 days ago
|
|
|
> There was a top-down decision that tech could not be covered positively, even when there was a true, newsworthy and positive story. I'd never heard anything like it. Business shouldn't be about stories, it should be about products and services. Journalists and editorial teams are skeptics by nature, of course they will be suspicious when they see people from SV run their mouth about politics and becoming "thought leaders". Where are the supposedly negative pieces on Microsoft, Intel, nVidia or IBM? Nowhere to be seen because these companies and those who lead them have perfected the art of not talking about politics or any politics related matter. |
|
|
Why ?
Because performance/cost wise, it make sense.
Intel, while an inovator back in the day, has been left behind in term of design compared to AMD.
And its CEO qualifying Europe as a leftist hellhole dangerous to invest in doesn't sound like he really get it and play instead politics.