[kareemsabri]

How is it misleading it's an accurate statement of the findings of an analysis. Your argument is they won't see those tokens cause they're gonna search out the one they like (and that one won't be a scam?)

What they'll conclude reading this is "wow, crypto is full of scams" and be right.

[Sargos]

It's accurate in the sense that "97% of email is scams and phishing" which is a neat fact but doesn't indict email as a failure.

Email and Uniswap are both useful tools that are safe to use for even non-technical users. In fact Uniswap is safer as spam filters aren't 100% reliable but Uniswap's lists nearly are.

[dmak]

Great analogy!

[nuclearnice1]

Sargos explained how it’s misleading.

> “97% of the tokens are scams so Uniswap is unsafe to use"

People are likely to draw the unsafe assumption.

Sargos attempted to clarify that some safety is created with filtering via a trusted list.

[kareemsabri]

He explained his argument. I disagreed.

My conclusion reading it was, crypto tokens are 98% scams. Uniswap is an exchange. It's a utility, using an open protocol. It's makeup reflects the makeup of the domain.

[nuclearnice1]

You asked how it was misleading.

I told you.