|
|
|
|
|
by londons_explore
1323 days ago
|
|
Every time I see a 'charger' like this I'm disappointed. This isn't a charger. It is a fancy electrical junction box. The voltage into the box and the voltage out is the same. The only function of the box is to switch the power on and off. And the car already has a switch in to switch stuff on and off anyway. So this box of expensive electronics is entirely redundant. And they don't even provide much power - typically 32 Amps at 230 volts. Ie. about the same as a caravan hookup. But a caravan hookup doesn't need to run Linux... |
|
That is false. These are much more sophisticated than a mere relay. Sure, there is basic logic between vehicles and EVSEs which is basically a smart relay: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAE_J1772#Signaling
...but the electronics you mentioned are for onboard controls (energy monitoring, Time of Use enforcement, load balancing between multiple units, etc). Some EVSEs are very simple, but many -- including the one in the article -- also handle upstream communication like OCPP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Charge_Point_Protocol https://www.chargepoint.com/files/OCPP-Fact-Sheet.pdf
Here is an example of integrations for the model in the article: https://zaptec.com/downloads/ZapChargerPro_Integration.pdf
There are also implementations of power line communication over the Control Pilot pin in J1772, which most people notice when charging via CCS at a DC Fast Charger, but that is not limited to L3 charging. Note that QCA7005 chip in the article: https://www.qualcomm.com/products/application/wireless-netwo...
See also: Plug and Charge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_15118