|
|
|
|
|
|
by gjsman-1000
1313 days ago
|
|
|
> It has no moving parts, is half the size, and twice as powerful as Combined Charging System (CCS) connectors. It's just a connector. Why did CCS have to be twice as big then? What's the tradeoff CCS took? Edit: I just looked up a size comparison of CCS vs Tesla/NACS and what the heck happened... |
|
|
It would have been like USB-C being glued to the top of an old SCSI connector.
Tesla controlled both ends (literally) on theirs and so they could optimize for size/etc.