|
|
|
|
|
|
by 4h53n
1314 days ago
|
|
|
If we went with latter we would need more land to feed same number of people. There is more "nature" when we leave the forest as is and not cut it down to, to convert it to a poorly run "human land". > There were more cereal calories per person in 2020 than in 1992. And this abundance was brought about without massive increases in the area being farmed. While industrial emissions rocketed, emissions due to land-use change fell by a quarter. We were able to more than triple our output in that period. https://www.economist.com/special-report/2022/11/01/a-lot-ca... |
|
|