Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sniperjoe360 1313 days ago
"Five patients had stable disease, and the other 11 had disease progression as best response on therapy"

great science, but disappointing clinical results

3 comments

They weren't trying to get results, only giving a low dose to verify acceptable side effects. Wait for the larger doses to render judgement on clinical results of the treatment modality itself.
I completely agree with you. If there was even one response I would be much more optimistic. Since there is no clinical signal this is at best a proof of concept and safety.
> Although the efficacy of the treatment was low, the researchers used relatively small doses of T cells to establish the safety of the approach, says Ribas. “We just need to hit it stronger the next time,” he says.
They did a low dose as this is new technology, the next round will have a higher count, so hopefully we'll see greater efficacy.
shit man i pray to fucking god for better resutls