|
|
|
|
|
by chollida1
1323 days ago
|
|
> The strategy they are describing (selling covered calls) is actually less risky than holding the underlying. Not necessarily. If you assume the idea is to make money, say a stock is at$100 a you sell a $110 call for $2 The stock then goes to $200. You have lost $90 of gains to make $2. That's a huge loss. Selling covered calls decreases your downside slightly but earning the option premium but it completely destroys your upside by taking away any of the upside beyond the call's strike. that's much riskier than just owning the stock outright as your downside is capped but yoru upside is unlimited. |
|
Using Abbot Labs as an example, a $2 option for 10% over current price would expire roughly 4 months out. So you could make $6/year, and only risk losing the gains over 10% that occur within each 4 months.
The types of stock I'll do with this are generally those I view as reliable, possibly with a dividend (yes, increasingly rare these days), with little exposure to catastrophic downside. This chunk of my portfolio is about minimizing the catastrophic as dollars 1-100,000 have a lot more utility in retirement than dollars 1,000,000 -> 1,100,000.