[jacobmartin]

Maddeningly, it doesn't even apply to all Latin -us nouns. For instance, the plural of apparatus should be apparatūs if we're applying the Latin rules. Apparati, as it might seem, makes no sense! So even when the pattern match correctly identifies the language, it can be misleading.

--fellow Latin nerd

[jjtheblunt]

apparatus is a past participle from apparare, so as an adjective plural would follow second declension, not fourth, i thought.

used as a noun, it's an (implicit thing) prepared (which preparatus would describe, but i guess we don't have any other word in English other than apparatus.

i don't have a Latin dictionary though

[jacobmartin]

apparatus is first/second as a past participle. I suppose it could be used as a substantive, but there is also a fourth declension noun with the same lemma meaning implements, tools, etc.: https://logeion.uchicago.edu/apparatus

[jjtheblunt]

4th or 5th declension esoterica ftw!